Difference between revisions of "Generics"

From Suhrid.net Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
 
You '''CANNOT''' do this:
 
You '''CANNOT''' do this:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="java5">
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="java5">
  List<Object> obj = new ArrayList<String>(); //NOT POSSIBLE
+
  List<Animal> obj = new ArrayList<Dog>(); //NOT POSSIBLE
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 +
 +
WHY ?
 +
 +
To prevent scenarios where you cannot add say, a Cat object to a Dog List.
 +
If the above conversion were possible it will be possible to do so.
 +
See below:
 +
 +
<syntaxhighlight lang="java5">
 +
 +
//NOTE : This is not possible actually, because the compiler prevents it.
 +
public void foo() {
 +
  List<Dog> dList = new ArrayList<Dog>();
 +
  addAnimal(dList); //Compiler flags an error here. a Dog list cannot be assigned to an Animal list
 +
}
 +
 +
private void addAnimal(List<Animal> aList) {
 +
  aList.add(new Cat());
 +
}
 +
 +
</syntaxhighlight>
 +
 +
  
 
[[Category:OCPJP]]
 
[[Category:OCPJP]]

Revision as of 03:05, 31 May 2011

  • Generics is a way to enforce ONLY compile-time type safety.
  • All the type information is not present at run-time. The compiler strips out type information from the bytecode using a process called type erasure.
  • WHY Type erasure ? To ensure backward compatibility with legacy code.
  • This compile-time safety is broken when generic and non-generic legacy code are mixed up.
  • Watch out when autoboxing is involved with legacy code.
List l = new ArrayList();
l.add(123); //Auto-boxing happens.
int i = l.get(0); //Compile-time error. Autounboxing cant work because get() returns Object and not Integer.


Polymorphism and Generics

List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();

Polymorphism only applies to the base type i.e list can be declared as arraylist You CANNOT do this:

 List<Animal> obj = new ArrayList<Dog>(); //NOT POSSIBLE

WHY ?

To prevent scenarios where you cannot add say, a Cat object to a Dog List. If the above conversion were possible it will be possible to do so. See below:

//NOTE : This is not possible actually, because the compiler prevents it.
public void foo() {
   List<Dog> dList = new ArrayList<Dog>();
   addAnimal(dList); //Compiler flags an error here. a Dog list cannot be assigned to an Animal list
}

private void addAnimal(List<Animal> aList) {
  aList.add(new Cat());
}